Pentagon Acquisition Chief Unveils Program Czars to Streamline Processes

The Pentagon’s Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, Michael Duffey, announced plans to introduce new “program czars” aimed at streamlining acquisition processes within the Defense Department. Speaking at the Reagan National Defense Forum, Duffey emphasized that these roles are intended to reduce bureaucratic obstacles rather than complicate them. “I don’t necessarily see it as layering; I actually think we’re removing layers,” he stated.

These new positions, known as Directors for Major Weapons Programs (DPRM), will oversee critical initiatives such as the Golden Dome project, submarines, and advanced fighter and ballistic missile systems. Each general officer appointed to these roles will report directly to Deputy Defense Secretary Steven Feinberg, bypassing traditional service leadership channels in the Air Force and Navy. Duffey believes this structure enhances efficiency by ensuring direct communication between the DPRMs and the program executive officers.

One notable DPRM appointment includes Lt. Gen. Dale White, who will oversee the development of the Air Force’s sixth-generation F-47 fighter jet. White will coordinate with both Feinberg and the program leadership within the Air Force, contributing to a governance board that includes Duffey and the Secretary of the Air Force. Duffey explained that these meetings will facilitate greater collaboration, ensuring all relevant parties are aligned on significant programs.

The Golden Dome initiative, led by Air Force Gen. Michael Guetlein, represents a complex integration of various defense systems aimed at enhancing homeland air defense. Duffey described it as “a unique animal” because it consolidates existing programs and technologies from across multiple branches of the military.

The establishment of these new DPRM roles is part of a broader strategy to accelerate weapon development within the Pentagon. This initiative follows a recent announcement by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who outlined a comprehensive acquisition reform plan. Duffey characterized this transformation as a “journey,” emphasizing the department’s commitment to fostering innovation and adaptability in its workforce.

To support this initiative, Duffey mentioned the implementation of guidance for 38 initiatives as part of the acquisition strategy. He expressed optimism regarding the support for these reforms, noting that the Pentagon is focusing on strengthening the munitions base through multi-year contracts that incentivize manufacturers to invest in production capabilities. “We’ve been paying attention to munitions. I’m optimistic that’ll be an early win for us,” he said, while acknowledging the need for continued congressional backing.

Although progress is being made, Duffey indicated that scaling other weapon lines might present challenges. He is committed to engaging with personnel to communicate the importance of adapting existing regulations. “Driving that kind of culture change, if you see a good idea… don’t ask for permission, just go do it,” he urged.

The Pentagon’s efforts to streamline acquisition processes and enhance weapon development are crucial in maintaining military readiness. As these new positions commence, the department anticipates that a monthly acquisition acceleration review will provide opportunities for stakeholders to identify ways to expedite the delivery of new technologies and systems.