American Right’s Surprising Admiration for Franco’s Legacy

The American far-right movement is increasingly drawing inspiration from historical European authoritarian figures, notably the late Spanish dictator, Francisco Franco. This trend has emerged even as contemporary political figures like Donald Trump face challenges in maintaining their influence.

A recent analysis by Dan Kaufman in the *New York Review of Books* highlights this revival of admiration for Franco among some factions in the United States, suggesting a troubling alignment with the past. Kaufman reviews Paul Preston‘s book, *Architects of Terror*, which examines the violent history of Franco’s regime. The parallels between Franco’s tactics and the modern far-right’s approach to dissent and governance cannot be overlooked.

Franco ruled Spain for 35 years following his victory in the Spanish Civil War, characterized by ruthless suppression of opposition. His regime managed to maintain a veneer of legitimacy by distancing itself from the more overt fascist governments of Italy and Germany after World War II. This strategic maneuvering allowed him to remain a Western ally, particularly during the Cold War, while employing brutal methods to silence dissent and enforce conformity.

Interestingly, the American right’s fascination with Franco has historical roots dating back to the 1950s. Prominent conservative figures, such as William F. Buckley Jr., praised Franco as a “national hero,” arguing that his oppressive methods were necessary for maintaining order. This admiration persists in certain circles today, as indicated by the support for figures like JD Vance and online commentators who echo similar sentiments.

The complexities of Franco’s legacy have led to a selective memory among supporters. Many choose to overlook the regime’s violent repression of ethnic and cultural minorities, including Catalan and Basque populations, as well as the persecution of LGBTQ communities. Instead, they focus on a narrative of national pride and restoration of traditional values, reminiscent of the rhetoric used by contemporary right-wing politicians.

In examining the appeal of figures like Franco, one must also consider the broader context of European authoritarianism. The casual comparison of Trump to historical figures such as Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini raises important questions about the nature of political leadership and the potential for similar movements to gain traction in today’s political climate.

Franco’s ability to navigate complex political landscapes while maintaining a grip on power serves as a cautionary tale. His regime’s oppressive tactics resonate with certain factions of the American right that seek to challenge the status quo. This movement often invokes familiar tropes of patriotism and traditionalism, echoing the sentiments that fueled Franco’s rise.

As the landscape shifts in both the United States and Europe, the connections between these historical figures and contemporary leaders continue to evolve. The admiration for Franco among certain right-wing groups poses significant questions about the direction of political discourse and the potential resurgence of authoritarianism in democratic societies.

The exploration of these connections is essential for understanding the current political climate. By examining the past, we can better comprehend the dynamics at play today and the implications for future governance. The resurgence of interest in Franco is not merely a historical curiosity; it reflects ongoing struggles over identity, power, and the very nature of democracy in the modern age.