The Weeknd Snubbed Again: Grammy Nominations Spark Outrage

The Grammy nominations for 2025 have ignited controversy, particularly regarding the absence of Canadian artist The Weeknd, whose real name is Abel Tesfaye. This snub has drawn ire from fans and industry observers alike, especially given his significant contributions to music over the past decade.

After a tumultuous history with the Recording Academy, including a public boycott following the 2020 nominations where his album After Hours received no recognition despite widespread acclaim, the latest nominations have reignited discussions about the awards’ relevance. The Weeknd’s track “Cry for Me” was notably absent from the nominations list for Best Pop Solo Performance, drawing criticism for overlooking a track that has resonated with both fans and critics.

History of Tension with the Grammys

The Weeknd’s fraught relationship with the Grammys dates back to his initial nominations in 2016 when his album Beauty Behind the Madness garnered attention but ultimately failed to secure wins in major categories. Despite winning Best Urban Contemporary Album for Starboy, many felt the album did not reflect its cultural impact.

Last year, it appeared that the tensions might ease when The Weeknd returned to perform at the Grammys in 2025, signifying a potential reconciliation. The Recording Academy had made promises to enhance the transparency of its nomination process, leading to hopes of a more inclusive future. Yet, the recent nominations have dashed these aspirations, leaving many to question the Academy’s ability to adapt to the evolving music landscape.

The Cultural Impact of The Weeknd

The Weeknd is more than just a chart-topping artist; he has significantly influenced the soundscape of modern R&B, amassing over 86.9 billion streams. His latest album, Hurry Up Tomorrow, is seen as a culmination of his artistic journey, showcasing his evolution as a musician. Each track is crafted with cinematic precision, reflecting his unique vision and sound.

Critics and fans alike have praised his ability to reinvent himself across albums, transitioning from the melancholic themes of Trilogy to the futuristic stylings of Starboy. Despite his artistic growth, the Academy’s decisions seem increasingly out of touch with the cultural impact of his work. The exclusion of “Cry for Me” underscores a disconnect between the industry’s standards and the realities of contemporary music.

The ongoing snub raises questions about the Grammy Awards’ relevance in acknowledging the voices that shape popular culture. The Weeknd’s absence from this year’s nominations feels personal; it reflects a broader issue within the industry regarding its acknowledgement of transformative artists. While he has outgrown the need for validation from the Academy, the consistent oversight of his contributions to music speaks volumes about the institution’s evolving criteria for excellence.

The conversation surrounding The Weeknd and the Grammys is far from over. As fans express their frustration, the Academy faces mounting pressure to address its nomination processes and reflect the true diversity and innovation present in today’s music industry. The tension between The Weeknd and the Grammys serves as a reminder that the landscape of music continues to change, and institutions must adapt or risk losing their relevance.