Connect with us

Top Stories

California Governor Candidates Clash Over Transgender Sports Rights

editorial

Published

on

URGENT UPDATE: The California governor race for 2026 is heating up as candidates voice their positions on whether transgender students should compete in school sports based on their gender identity. This contentious issue is emerging as a critical topic ahead of the election, with voters eager for clear stances from the eleven candidates vying for the governorship.

In exclusive interviews conducted by CBS News California Investigates correspondent Julie Watts, candidates shared their views on California’s current law, which guarantees transgender students the right to participate in sports teams that align with their gender identity. The law mandates that public schools allow students to compete on sex-segregated teams and utilize facilities based on their gender identity, irrespective of what is listed on school records.

Recent polling from the Public Policy Institute of California reveals significant public sentiment on this issue: 65% of Californians and 71% of public school parents support a policy requiring students to participate in sports teams matching their sex at birth. This backdrop of public opinion adds urgency to the candidates’ responses.

CANDIDATE POSITIONS: The candidates present a spectrum of opinions, ranging from outright opposition to transgender athletes in women’s sports to strong support for existing rights. Republican candidate Steve Hilton fiercely argues against transgender girls competing in girls’ sports, stating, “It’s not fair for girls who’ve worked so hard.” He pledges to repeal the current law, claiming it violates sections of the California Constitution.

Similarly, fellow Republican and Riverside County sheriff Chad Bianco emphasizes safety in his stance: “Boys should not be competing against girls.” He insists that there will be no tolerance for situations he deems inappropriate, guaranteeing, “There will never be an 18-year-old boy walking through a 14-year-old girl’s locker room naked.”

Conversely, Democratic candidates express varying levels of support for current laws. Tony Thurmond, California’s superintendent of public instruction, firmly defends the rights of transgender athletes, asserting, “We are a state that can accept diversity.” He vows to uphold the law that protects transgender students’ rights to participate in sports.

Another Democrat, Katie Porter, supports the current law but believes decisions should rest with sports governing bodies rather than politicians. “These are rules that can and should be set by the governing bodies,” she states.

The complexity of the issue is evident. Candidates like Butch Ware advocate for a non-political approach, suggesting that governing bodies should make decisions regarding sports participation. In contrast, Ian Calderon, a former state assemblymember, acknowledges potential athletic advantages for transgender girls but emphasizes the need for compassion towards all students involved.

While some candidates advocate for a more inclusive approach, others, like Antonio Villaraigosa, differentiate based on biological factors, believing that transgender women who have gone through puberty should not compete against cisgender women.

The stakes are high as the 2026 election approaches, with the issue of transgender athletes in school sports becoming a defining battleground. Candidates are urged to clarify their positions as voters seek to understand the implications of each stance.

LOOKING AHEAD: As the race progresses, expect ongoing debates and public discussions surrounding this vital issue. The next series of interviews will continue to explore other pressing topics, including crime, homelessness, and healthcare, ensuring voters have the information needed to make informed decisions.

Stay tuned for updates as CBS News California Investigates continues to provide comprehensive coverage of the candidates and their positions in the lead-up to the election.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.