**Urgent Review Finds Ed Martin Leaked Grand Jury Materials**

BREAKING: An urgent review by the U.S. Department of Justice has uncovered that Ed Martin, a close ally of Donald Trump, improperly leaked secret grand jury materials related to investigations of the president’s political adversaries. This alarming revelation raises significant concerns about the integrity of judicial processes and political interference.

The investigation, led by the office of Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, confirmed that Martin mishandled grand jury materials tied to probe inquiries into Democratic Senator Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James. This misconduct was reportedly a key factor in Martin’s early removal from DOJ headquarters on January 1, 2026, where he was abruptly reassigned to a different location.

Sources familiar with the review disclosed that Martin had initially denied any wrongdoing when questioned by DOJ officials. However, subsequent emails surfaced revealing that he had indeed shared sensitive grand jury information, raising serious ethical questions. According to one insider, the findings of misconduct provided grounds for the deputy attorney general to further distance Martin from his previous duties.

Despite these allegations, Martin remains in his role as the Pardon Attorney and is expected to leave the department within weeks. He has not been charged with a crime, and the DOJ has not conclusively determined if any laws were violated. In a statement, Blanche insisted, “there are no misconduct investigations into Ed Martin. Ed is doing a great job as Pardon Attorney.” However, this claim does not address the findings regarding Martin’s handling of grand jury materials.

Martin’s significant role in Trump’s campaign against perceived political enemies has drawn national attention. He has been pivotal in efforts to investigate figures like Schiff and prosecute former FBI Director James Comey. Notably, a judge dismissed the cases against Comey and James in November, citing improper appointments of the prosecutors involved.

The investigation into Martin’s conduct gained traction after a witness, identified as Christine Bish, a Republican from California, appeared in court seeking to testify regarding her interactions with individuals claiming to work alongside Martin and Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte. This inquiry has led to suspicions that these individuals might have been impersonating federal agents. Following this, Attorney General Pam Bondi attempted to clarify the situation, stating, “There is no investigation into Bill Pulte,” although she provided no further details.

Despite Martin’s removal from the helm of the Weaponization Working Group, sources indicate that the group has continued its work unabated. This unit is actively reviewing law enforcement actions taken during the Biden administration for instances of what Bondi has labeled “politicized justice.” Findings from this review are expected to be released soon, potentially adding further context to the ongoing investigations.

As this story develops, it raises critical questions about the interplay between politics and the justice system, suggesting a growing urgency for transparency and accountability at the highest levels of government. The implications of these findings will likely resonate far beyond the courtroom, impacting public trust in federal institutions.

Stay tuned for more updates as this situation unfolds.