Advocating for Human Lookouts: A Retired Forest Service Perspective

A retired Forest Service employee is advocating for the continued operation of the Colby Mountain Lookout, emphasizing the unique advantages of human observation over camera technology. In a letter addressed to Lassen National Forest Supervisor Rick Hobson, Gary McHargue argues for the necessity of keeping the lookout staffed, citing his extensive experience and firsthand knowledge of the area.

McHargue, who served for 31 years in various roles within the Forest Service, hired Ken Jordan as a fire detection lookout at the Colby Mountain Lookout in 1985. He describes Jordan as one of the best hires of his career, noting his commitment and keen attention to detail. This personal testimony sets the stage for McHargue’s argument that human lookouts are irreplaceable when it comes to fire detection.

Human Insight vs. Technology

The core of McHargue’s argument revolves around the limitations of camera systems. He asserts that while cameras can provide some level of surveillance, they fall short in evaluating complex terrain and adapting to changing weather conditions. For instance, he points out that certain areas around the lookout, such as Deer Creek Canyon, are blind spots for cameras. A trained lookout, familiar with the terrain, can actively scout these areas to detect smoke from potential fires early on.

McHargue highlights the importance of human adaptability, especially during critical times. For example, during lightning storms, a lookout can pinpoint strike locations and relay this information to dispatchers in real-time. This proactive approach allows for a more effective initial response to wildfires, particularly when humidity levels are higher and temperatures lower at night.

He further illustrates the effectiveness of human observation by referencing a historical incident from the mid-1970s, when a “Sleeper Start” was detected in the West Branch of the Feather River months after a lightning storm. This type of timely detection is crucial for preventing small fires from escalating into larger, more destructive wildfires.

Preservation of Resources

In his visit to the Colby Mountain Lookout last fire season, McHargue noted that while the structure appeared sound, it required maintenance, including repairs to grounding wires and a fresh coat of paint. He expressed concern that wildfire detection efforts have been undervalued within the broader context of fire suppression funding. He believes that while resources for active firefighting units are essential, investment in lookout towers and personnel is equally important for long-term fire prevention.

McHargue argues that federal funding is increasingly difficult to secure, yet he emphasizes that the cost of early detection is minimal compared to the expenses associated with major wildfire suppression efforts. “A well-trained individual with 40 years of experience and an existing lookout tower” forms the backbone of a viable wildfire detection program, he stated.

He concludes with a strong call for common sense, suggesting that maintaining the Colby Mountain Lookout is a beneficial investment for both the Lassen National Forest and the local communities, including Butte Meadows and Philbrook Lake. McHargue’s insights provide a compelling case for the value of human observation in wildfire detection, stressing that technology has not yet reached a point where it can fully replace the expertise of trained personnel.